Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to luanpanno.dev

Luan Panno | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
aiivanov.dev
AI | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
jurajhamran.com
Juraj Hamran | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
adityatarar.com
Aditya Tarar | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
louguzman.dev
Luis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
reganmuthomi.com
Regan Muthomi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
bytethecarrot.dev
Portfolio - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
aimansyafiqdev.com
Aiman Syafiq | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
adamrasheed.com
Adam Rasheed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
reicolee.com
Reico Lee | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
adeancolon.com
Adean Colón — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
owenkobasz.com
Owen Kobasz | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
0xomer.com
Omer | Software Engineer & Instructor
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
eddieb.dev
Eddie Benedetti | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alanxgarcia.dev
Alan Garcia | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
juancarloscruz.com
Juan Carlos Cruz — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
juridedej.com
Juri Dedej | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
buraktomruk.dev
Burak Tomruk | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.