Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lstebner.com

luke stebner - software engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
lukestebner.com
luke stebner - software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
andynewman.dev
Andy Newman - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
andrewdeck.dev
Andrew Deck | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
bruxromuar.com
Brux Romuar - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
juriw.com
Juri Welz - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
akshaymondal.com
Akshay Mondal - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
luisgdev.com
Luis Garcia - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
juanchristian.com
Juan Christian — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alejandrovecchio.dev
Alejandro Vecchio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alfunkso.net
Alfonso Cornejo – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
funwil.com
Awil | Software Engineer - FE
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
louguzman.dev
Luis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
julabrego.com
Julián Ábrego | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
juanpa.dev
Fullstack Software engineer - Juanpa
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
bruceldev.com
Bruce Lee - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abrilberliando.com
Abril Berliando | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
brunocalou.com
Bruno Calou - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.