Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lsredding.com

L.S. Redding — Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
juliamaeseales.com
Julia Seales — Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
andrewschrader.com
Andrew Schrader — Author & Filmmaker
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
owenmackaman.com
Owen Mackaman — Author
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
tessa-king.com
Tessa King – Meet author, Tessa King
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
ebwainright.com
E. B. Wainwright — Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
terrigreeningauthor.com
Terri Greening – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
judysavinar.com
Judy Savinar — Author of Kissing Strangers
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
annacrowleyredding.com
Anna Crowley Redding: Award-winning Author for Children and Teens
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
brushoulai.com
Brush Oulai — Author of Adult & Children's Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
lorajones.com
Lora Jones | Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
julesbakes.com
Jules Bakes — author of SEA LEGS
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
kaelthren.com
Kael'Thren — Author & Playwright
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
luclifton.com
Lu Clifton | Award-Winning Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
msharstine.com
M.S. Harstine – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
alexhmpreston.com
Alex Preston, author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
loriannauthor.com
Lori Ann, Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
reharper.com
RE Harper - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
jtimothylaine.com
J. Timothy Laine — Amazon Bestselling Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.