Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to loukas.dev

Chat Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
andrigerber.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
80match
aswdq.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
76match
ashwinsanthosh.com
Ashwin's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
aaronhsu.me
Aaron Hsu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
echo-paulus.com
Echo's Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
lukaszmalucha.com
Coding Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
andycraig.dev
Andy Craig | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
andymek.dev
Andreas Dymek - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
ahadchowdhury.com
Ahad Chowdhury | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
atulparida.com
Atul Parida | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
mukundraman.com
Mukund's Portfolio | Home
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
anikhetmulky.com
Anikhet's Portfolio Website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
furqanman.com
Furqan Khan - Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
andrewsuh.ai
Andrew Suh - AI Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
a3ro.dev
Akshat Kushwaha | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
junekim-design.com
June Kim's Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
aashishkapoor.dev
Aashish Kapoor's Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
abhialgoforge.org
Abhi-AlgoForge Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.