Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lotus-engineer.com

The Lotus Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
jtaylorsoftware.com
Jeremy Taylor | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
oziguerra.com
Oziel Guerra | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
mrdaliri.com
Reza Daliri | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
bsgrigorov.com
Borislav Grigorov - DevOps Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
eddarmitage.com
Edd Armitage - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
abroro.com
abroro - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ataekren.com
Ata Ekren - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
abittraveled.com
Abhi Krishnan - Fullstack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
alexhchen.net
Alex Chen | Full Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
holedev.com
holedev - Software Engineering
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
jsteagle.dev
Justus - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
aungmoe.com
Aung Moe
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ozhan.dev
Ozzy 🪄
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
alexander-khomenko.dev
Alexander Khomenko — software engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
andytang.dev
Andy's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
singharaj.com
Singharaj Usai | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
byzach.dev
Zach Bauer | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
ahmed-dev.tech
Ahmed Shafi - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.