Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to loriordan.com

Lee J. O'Riordan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
caiocarvalho.dev
Caio Carvalho
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alexlazcano.dev
Alex Lazcano
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
gaareth.com
Gareth - Homepage
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
luisferhenriquez.com
Developer Portfolio | Terminal v1.0.5
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sinavahidi.dev
Sina | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
lukasdohmen.com
Lukas Dohmen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
juancwu.dev
Juan Wu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
angry-dev-thoughts.com
Angry dev thoughts - Software developers are sometimes angry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
papafe.dev
Papafe
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
callmephilip.com
callmephilip | Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
gabogil.com
Gabo Gil – Some personal notes and tips about Software Development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
hitaesh.com
Hitaesh's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
thatbrothacodes.com
thatbrothacodes | Software development from a brotha's perspective
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
asyncadventures.com
Async Adventures
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
rennerocha.com
Renne Rocha | Renne Rocha
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
3bbas.dev
Ahmed Abbas - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
agingdeveloper.net
The Aging Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
egorikas.com
Egor Grishechko's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.