Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lorensr.com

Loren Sands-Ramshaw · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
astocaza.dev
Percy Astocaza
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
thebrianemory.com
Menu
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewbantly.dev
Andrew Bantly | Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
jsandgren.com
Johan Sandgren - Software Engineer in Gothenburg, Sweden
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
munadil.com
Munadil - Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
recodebrain.com
RecodeBrain | Share Knowledge to add value
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lucasgallen.com
Lucas: Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
lucasginard.com
LucasGinard
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bryangan.com
Bryan Gan - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
cadhan.dev
Cádhan Nelis / Computer Science
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
7-views.com
7-Views - Developers Blog : 7-Views
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
justinlevi.com
Justin Winter
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alexanderfletcher.dev
Alex's Blog
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
lost-code.dev
Lost Code
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
frontierjs.com
DevX Independence on the Frontier - FrontierJS
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
julianbez.com
Julian Bez - Senior Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
simplyaam.com
SimplyAam - Mohammad Adeel | Portfolio & Learning Journal
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alexandersson.org
Dennis Alexandersson
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.