Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lorenlee.com

Frontend developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
ankitlakhlan.com
Ankit | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
jundymek.com
Jundymek | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
eddieorozco.com
Eddie – Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
atleugim.dev
Miguel Vega - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
annelee.net
Anne Lee | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
hongwei.dev
Hong Wei | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
adamrboyd.dev
Adam Boyd | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
sidorov.io
Sidorov.io - frontend developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andreyblack.com
AB | Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abaza.tech
Omar Abaza — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
adamhutson.info
Adam Hutson - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
astrode.dev
Astrode.Dev - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ashleykircher.com
Ashley Kircher | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ate3f.com
Mohamed Atef | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
remilalanne.com
Rémi Lalanne | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andrewpwatson.com
Andrew Watson - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ahmedelbalal.dev
Ahmed Elbalal | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
julianstan.com
Julian Stan — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.