Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lookedintoit.com

Genesis Collective · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
5qco.com
The 5th Quarter Collective
1 shared topicsventure-capital
69match
athletesandfounders.com
Athletes & Founders - Exclusive Investment Collective
1 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
active.vc
Active Capital
1 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
7bridges.org
7 Bridges Collective | Redemptive Accelerator & Angel Group
1 shared topicsventure-capital
65match
looplicate.com
Looplicate — Selective Introductions for the Right Firms
1 shared topicsventure-capital
65match
activant.tech
Activant
1 shared topicsventure-capital
65match
regeneravc.com
RegenEra Ventures | Investing in Regenerative Medicine
1 shared topicsventure-capital
64match
justinyuan.com
Justin Yuan — Interactive AI & Gaming Investor | TIRTA Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
64match
cpluscap.com
C+ Capital | Venture Capital & SPV
1 shared topicsventure-capital
64match
echogrowthpartners.com
Echo Growth Partners
1 shared topicsventure-capital
64match
abisolacapital.com
ABCAP
1 shared topicsventure-capital
64match
sillygooseia.com
Silly Goose Interactive Corp.
1 shared topicsventure-capital
64match
terriburns.com
Type Capital
1 shared topicsventure-capital
64match
aldiva.vc
Aldiva — venture capital investor
1 shared topicsventure-capital
63match
activ8growthpartners.com
Activ8 Growth Partners
1 shared topicsventure-capital
63match
mssinvestmentholdings.com
MSS | Building the Platforms of Future Economies
1 shared topicsventure-capital
63match
bullpencap.com
Bullpen Capital
1 shared topicsventure-capital
63match
effventures.com
Earth First Food Ventures | alternative proteins
1 shared topicsventure-capital

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.