similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to longbeardstudios.com

Longbeard Studios · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

agileos · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

loscwy · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

rpaka-farm · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

redrzr (redrzr) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Cortari · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

Hoko Data Insights · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

akshchand (Aksh) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

lpmanansala.com

lpmanansala (Lester) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

efreak-dev (efreak) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewhall (Andrew Hall) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

efemeralbit.com

ephemeralbit (Felix Wyss) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

efemeralbits.com

ephemeralbit (Felix Wyss) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewbmccullough.com

andrewbmccullough (Andrew McCullough) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

JRUCS · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

efindus · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

laralabs.uk 🇬🇧

Laralabs · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.