similar sites

Sites similar to lexor.dev

lexordev · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

ALAWI CO · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

jg-lopes · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

noijen (BN) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

meialau (Meiallu) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

alderiosproject · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

byteflamesoftware.com

mrpowe07 (Matt Powers) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

sdoodyirl (Shane Doody) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

donkooijman.com

donkooijman (Don Kooijman) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

nielsenjack.com

nielsenjack (Jack Nielsen) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Nimut · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

apisq · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

liammullane.com

liam-m · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

anyfld · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

trey-k · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

rogueconsulting.dev

RogueConsulting.dev · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

leofigs · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jinxapi · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.