Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to lexitoshi.com

Fine Art by Lex – Contemporary art by a Dutch master · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
pilitaart.com
Pilita Bryant Art – Contemporary Artist
2 shared topicspainting
72match
oharewilliams.com
O'Hare Williams – Contemporary New England Fine Art
2 shared topicspainting
71match
andreajepp.com
contemporary art Andrea Jepp
2 shared topicspainting
71match
katelanxon.com
Kate Lanxon – Contemporary Oil Paintings
2 shared topicspainting
71match
azitaconte.com
Contemporary Art | Azita Arts
2 shared topicspainting
70match
cfosterart.com
C. Foster Art | Canadian contemporary artist
2 shared topicspainting
70match
alexissmalolo.com
Alexiss Malolo - Contemporary Fine Artist
2 shared topicspainting
70match
dayetco.com
DAYETCO - Contemporary Artist
2 shared topicspainting
70match
kanvasugal.com
Kanvasugal - Contemporary Artist
2 shared topicspainting
70match
agpainter.com
AG painter | Contemporary art | Edinburgh
2 shared topicspainting
70match
alexandrasharmaart.com
Alexandra Sharma Art – Contemporary Multi-Media Artist
2 shared topicspainting
70match
avislw.com
Contemporary Art | Avis Lane Willan
2 shared topicspainting
70match
ancastefanescu.com
Anca Stefanescu | Contemporary Art
2 shared topicspainting
70match
kemalseyhan.com
Kemal Seyhan - Contemporary Artist
2 shared topicspainting
70match
deeptilamba.com
Deepti Lamba - Contemporary Artist
2 shared topicspainting
70match
aladinmusicandart.com
Danila Tramacere | Contemporary Art
2 shared topicspainting
70match
katebellart.com
katebellart – Welsh contemporary painter
2 shared topicspainting
70match
agnesperezart.com
Agnes Perez Art - Contemporary art
2 shared topicspainting

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.