Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lexadev.com

LexaDev - Future of Web Development · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
madani.dev
Madani Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
pixelkarma.com
PIXELKARMA Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
netzonesolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
Netzone Web Development Solutions
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ripplence.com
Ripplence | App & Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
2pwebdev.com
2pwebdev - Custom Web Development Solutions
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
iskron.com
Iskron — Web & App Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rethinkwebdev.com
Rethink Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
richadev.com
RichaDev - Professional Web Development & Digital Solutions
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
bavadigitech.com
Bavadigitech - Digital Solutions & Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
iteamlancer.com
Web Development Agency - iTeamLancer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
beejaysoft.com
BeeJaySoft - Web Development Services
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
gedde.dev
Gedde Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
rfdevs.com
RF Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
compassweb.dev
Welcome - Compass Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
geekbug.dev
GeekBug Dev — The New Era of Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
riosdev.com
Rios Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
geniashumakov.com
geniashumakov - Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
plwolfdev.com
Perry Wolf Web Development Space
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.