Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to lermind.com

LERMIND — Shay Lerman | Designer & Problem Solver · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
noahbjones.com
Noah Benjamin Jones Design | Graphic Designer & Problem Solver
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
deerspace.io
Daiji Shikama | Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
ayanna-bost.com
Ayanna Bost | Brand Designer & Art Director
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
lermioglu.com
Lermioglu - Designer | Lermioglu
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
alejandrabernuy.com
Alejandra Bernuy | Vancouver Multidisciplinary Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
deekshakhiremath.com
Deeksha | Multidisciplinary Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
noahlaurent.com
Noah Laurent — Graphic Designer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
alefsofit.com
Yehonatan Shapira — Product & Visual Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
dejanzafirovski.com
Product/UX Designer & Illustrator | Dejan Zafirovski
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
firuzaazizova.com
Firuza Azizova | Graphic Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
ca-tran.com
Ca Tran — Multidisciplinary Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
alddesign.com
Andrea Maher — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
gracehuh.com
Grace Huh — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
studioevani.com
Home - Graphic design | Studio Evan
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
jinnyhyun.com
Jinny Hyun | Graphic Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
levinyuri.com
Yuri Levin | Designer & Creative Director
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
nicoscheinkman.com
Nico Scheinkman — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
rohamworks.com
RohamWorks - Graphic Designer & Branding Expert
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.