Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to leofer.com

Leonardo Ferreira · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
iago-ferreira.com
iago ferreira
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
andrade.io
Leonardo Andrade
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
lvbernal.com
Home | Leonardo Vargas
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
dcferreira.com
Daniel C Ferreira <dcferreira>
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
sonsini.dev
Riccardo Sonsini
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bernardogv.com
Home — bernardogv.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andrelizardo.com
André Lizardo | Substack
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
sonarspeak.com
SonarSpeak
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
alexreisner.com
Alex Reisner
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
nicholasrinard.com
Nicholas Rinard
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
agentferdy.com
Ferdy Home - Ferdy
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
nicofehr.com
Nico Fehr | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
pierrewallin.com
Home | Pierre Wallin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
karolproksa.com
Karol Proksa&#x27;s blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
ruivieira.dev
Welcome – ruivieira.dev
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
bworks.dev
Home — Adam Beauferris
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
solutionsmark.com
Mark Ferraz · Operator, founder, builder, thinker, architect, author
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
pierre-merlet.com
Pierre Merlet - Data Scientist
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.