similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to learningwithfrannie.com

Learningwithfrannie alternatives & similar sites

Learning with Frannie: Online or in-person tutoring/coaching — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Special Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
3dlearning.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	HOME \| 3d Reading and Learning Online Tutoring K-12	en	special-education Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clearconceptswithclara.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ClearConcepts with Clara Tutoring	en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icantutoring.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	iCan Tutoring \| Specialist Online SEN Tutoring - KS2 to GCSE	en	special-education	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
strivelearningsolutions.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Private K–12 Tutoring in Denver	en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bannistertutoring.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Bannister Tutoring – Creating Pathways to Reading for Dyslexic Students	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
help-kidz-learn.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HelpKidzLearn \| Online Learning for Special Education	en	special-education Umbraco	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helpkidzlearn.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HelpKidzLearn \| Online Learning for Special Education	en	special-education Umbraco	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helpkidzlearn.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HelpKidzLearn \| Online Learning for Special Education	en	special-education Umbraco	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helpkidzlearn.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HelpKidzLearn \| Online Learning for Special Education	en	special-education Umbraco	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3dtutoring.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	K-12 Tutoring in Cleveland, Ohio \| 3D Tutoring	US~ en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
accommodatingwithkc.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Accommodating with KC	en	special-education Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dev-learningally.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Audiobooks for Dyslexia & Learning Disabilities \| Learning Ally	US~ en	special-education DotNetNuke/DNN	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
rockingreading.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ONLINE READING TUTOR THAT MAKES THE PROCESS FUN - Online Reading Tutor That Makes The Process Fun	en	special-education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iepreport.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	IEP Progress Monitoring Software with Parent Access \| IEP Report	en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindguidelearning.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Orton-Gillingham and Multisensory Math Tutoring for students with Dyslexia, Dyscalculia and ADHD.	en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
missinglinktutoring.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Missing Link Tutoring	en	special-education Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
milwaukeedyslexia.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Milwaukee Dyslexia \| Intervention for Language-Based Learning Challenges	en	special-education Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advantagetutoring.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Advantage Tutoring - Educational Services in Tampa, FL	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.