Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lauravanpassel.com

LAURA VAN PASSEL · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
62match
sofierycken.com
Sofie Rycken | Freelancejournaliste en copywriter
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
61match
robbinbesselink.com
Robbin Besselink - Creatieve vertaler Frans & Engels > Nederlands
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
60match
arjendejong.com
Arjen de Jong Concept & Copy | copywriter contentmanager webredacteur
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
60match
between-the-dots.com
Freelance Copywriter | Between the dots Creating Copywriting
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
60match
bozztexttranslations.com
Public relations, tekstschrijver en vertaalbureau | BOZZ
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
60match
aydendijkstra.com
Ayden Carlo | Tekstschrijver en schrijfbegeleider | Utrecht
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
60match
bospoort-translations.com
Bospoort Translations – Dutch Translator Copywriter
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
60match
vinteachmedia.com
VinTeach Media | NT2-docent | Schrijver | Eindredacteur | Vertaler
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
60match
bbcopywriting.com
Copywriting voor coaches | BB Copy
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
32match
anneveldt.net
Portfolio van Eelco Anneveldt - Freelance Copywriter
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
31match
ugcishahernandez.com
UGC Portfolio Isha Hernandez Pinedo
1 shared topicscontent-production
30match
analytic-storytelling.com
Wij maken inhoud-gedreven verhalen - Analytic Storytelling
1 shared topicscontent-production
30match
bokslag.com
Maarten Bokslag tekst en concept -
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.