similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to lauralanderauthor.com

Laura Lander, Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

alexanderblackburn.com

Alexander Blackburn, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

D. L. Diehl, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Nick May, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Home - NH Authors

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

maurajortner.com

Author | Maura Jortner

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Roland Cam - Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arleneabundis.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arinabauthor.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cmillerauthor.com

C. Miller Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

gregtheauthor.com

Greg the Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

robertnwadiaru.com

Robert Nwadiaru, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

faysmithauthor.com

Fay Smith Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

dlcainauthor.com

Home | David L. Cain, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

dixiefrantz.com

Home | Dixie Frantz, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

familyenterprise2307.com

Peter Vaughan | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧

Carolyn Ellis | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alandettlaff.com

Alan J. Dettlaff — Scholar, Author, Abolitionist

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.