similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to lanningbennett.com

Lanning Bennett – Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

robertlongwood.com

Robert Longwood – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

theromanticpreacher.com

The Romantic Preacher – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rowan-alexander.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Rob Kempton - Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

robert-lautner.com

robertlautner | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bgerensanford.com

B. Geren Sanford – Author site

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bgarensanford.com

B. Geren Sanford – Author site

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Dannie M Olguin

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

billyhflynn.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

kyriejmcaffee.com

Kyrie J. McAffee

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

robertdanielsbooks.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anneschlebusch.com

Anne Schlebusch – A blooming author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ariel Gore – author, editor, teacher

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bellmcentire.com

Bell McEntire – Author/Artist/Educator

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bookishviolet.com

Bookish Violet – Librarian and Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.