Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to langhard.com

Matthias Langhard - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
andynewman.dev
Andy Newman - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
bogdan-nikolic.com
Bogdan Nikolic - Software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alejandrovecchio.dev
Alejandro Vecchio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
nezih.dev
Nezih | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
alfunkso.net
Alfonso Cornejo – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
matthewgoodson.com
Matthew Goodson - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
arthurhess.com
Arthur Hess - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mashoado.com
Masho Ado | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aryaziai.com
Arya Ziai | Front-End Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
akshaymondal.com
Akshay Mondal - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
arminsolecki.com
Armin Solecki - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewdeck.dev
Andrew Deck | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
angierodriguez.dev
Angie Rodriguez | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ahmad-mahmood.dev
Ahmad Mahmood - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abdul-wahhab.com
Abdul Wahhab | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
aiper.cloud
Christopher Hertel - Software Engineer in Berlin
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.