Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to labellift.dev

LabelLift · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
belliz.io
Devon Bellizio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
belsthomaz.dev
Isabella Thomaz
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
bluebellinteractive.com
Bluebell
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
bobmaertz.com
Bob Maertz
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
intellifi-ai.com
Home - intellifi-ai.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abelcloud.net
Abel's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
pieterheyvaert.com
Pieter Heyvaert
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
bencamps.me
Benjamin Campbell
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
clutchard.com
Richard Nelson | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
inteligentcomp.com
Intelligent computing
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
fellipe.com
Home | Davidson Fellipe
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
labbox.app
Labbox | Focused web products by Ernesto Casabella
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
abelhailemichael.dev
Abel Hailemichael - Homepage
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
iordneto.com
Iord Neto — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
anhzf.dev
A Developer Personal Site | Alwan Nuha ZF
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
nickcanarelli.com
Nick Canarelli | Freelance Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
abcdirectory.com
Website Technology Intelligence — ABCDirectory
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
cloudcraftmen.com
cloudCraftMenX | Intelligent Software Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.