Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to labazine.com

labazine - portfolio of scott powers · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
phumphreys.com
The Portfolio of Peter Humphreys
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
solomongebbie.com
Portfolio of Solomon Gebbie
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
alanchen.me
Alan Chen - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
fatimabadmos.com
Fatima Badmos - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
arodav.com
Arodav - Web Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
kristianbenko.com
Kristian Benko - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
adamdowning.dev
Adam Downing - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
matteo-aries.com
Matteo Aries - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
maxnelsonwebsite.com
Max Nelson - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
softwaresolutionssalem.com
Your Name - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
romariocoffie.com
Romario Coffie — Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
asiavalentine.dev
AsiaV - Portfolio Projects
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ahsanfaisal.me
Ahsan Faisal - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
rodkentito.com
Rod Kent Ito - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
ashleybuckingham.com
Portfolio 2026
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
djobbo.com
Djobbo - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
kubahruby.com
Jakub Hrubý - portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
boboplanic.com
Home page - Portfolio website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.