Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kylejava.dev

Kyle Java · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
activejava2.org
Active Java Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
kyleabreu.com
Kyle Abreu
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
kyleaclark.com
Kyle A. Clark
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
clojureforjava.com
Clojure for Java
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
animatedjavascript.org
Animated JavaScript
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
solver4j.com
Solver4J – The Java Solver
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kylefitch.com
Kyle Fitch - Programmer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
9lon.com
9lon - write JavaScript on a 2D canvas
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
8hob.io
8 Hobbies JavaScript Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
albinhasani.net
Albi’s Blog | Bytes of Java
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
robotjavascript.com
Robot JavaScript for EV3 Robots
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bighulk.net
Hulk's Blog | Frontend | Javascript
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dminer.com
Dminer - Visual Java Code Generator
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
docjava.com
DocJava HomePage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
kylezweng.com
Projects | Data Analytics | Kyle Zweng
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
arthurraposo.com
Arthur Raposo – Senior Java Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
newforms-tech.com
Jindent - Java Formatter & C/C++ Beautifier
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
interview6.com
Interview6 - JavaScript & ES6 Interview Guide
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.