Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to kyledaum.com

Portfolio · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
66match
mattcatrow.com
Matt Catrow, Architect
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
66match
hliebhaluzin.com
Hlieb's Portfolio
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
64match
jasonkyun.com
Portfolio
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
haneffinger.com
portfolio | han effinger
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
julianellerby.com
Julian Ellerby
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
kenzhenry.com
Mackenzie Henry
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
heysoloman.com
Soloman Garcia
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
apucolectivo.com
APU Colectivo
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
bairballiet.com
bairballiet
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
coralgarvey.com
CoralGarveyWork2024
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
margheritaurbani.com
Margherita Urbani
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
57match
a-bur.com
PORTFOLIO
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
56match
juliagerritsen.com
juliagerritsen
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
56match
jiaqivisual.com
JIAQI
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
56match
heyallyson.com
Allyson Griffiths
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
56match
matteomanenti.com
Matteo Manenti
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
54match
janellemomotani.com
Janelle Momotani
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
54match
guillemrafols.com
GuillemRafols
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.