Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kylebouwman.com

kybouw (Kyle Bouwman) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
kybouw.com
kybouw (Kyle Bouwman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
kylemade.com
kyleweiner (Kyle Weiner) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
nflverse.com
nflverse · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
robotsquidward.com
robotsquidward (A.J. Kueterman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
invition.dev
iNViTiON (MiX) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mattchard.com
mchar7 (Matt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
matthiasg.com
MatthiasGN (Matthias Giannesini) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
benedikt-lohse.dev
LinuxTux23 (bl) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
aroji.com
glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
arogy.com
glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
l-oj.com
larry-oj · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mattcoding.com
am-matt (Matthew Miller) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
adag.io
rpetrich (Ryan Petrich) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
robertsenseman.com
rsenseman (Rob) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
networkconsulting.tech
christianchapman (ChristianChapman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
networkcloudsecurity.com
christianchapman (ChristianChapman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
networkcloudconsulting.com
christianchapman (ChristianChapman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.