Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kyleabaker.dev

kyleabaker.com · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
andywhittaker.com
Home | AndyWhittaker.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kylecbaker.com
Kyle Baker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
robconner.com
Home - RobConner.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
bloomtimber.com
bloomtimber.com -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ipluster.com
Home - ipluster.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
newsbugger.com
NB - Newsbugger.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kylegeeks.com
KyleGeeks
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rohidesh.com
Home | rohidesh.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
artfulpanda.com
MountainViewServer.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
3dize.com
3Dize - 3Dize.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kwancro.com
Kwancro
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
bogdanvarlamov.com
Home | BogdanVarlamov.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
thesarayoung.com
Sara's Blog - Random Thoughts, Tips and Suggestions on Life and Technology
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
cloudimax.com
CloudiMax
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewtorkbaker.com
Andrew Tork Baker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
maydeer.com
box.maydeer.com - mail UI
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
rogueolive.com
RogueOlive
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thekupereport.com
TheKuperReport.comThe Kuper Report
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.