Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kyle-olson.com

Kyle Olson — Software Engineering Manager — San Francisco, California · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
swanathiyarath.com
A S Swan — Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
70match
itskushal.com
Kushal Kumar — Software Engineer II
1 shared topicscareers
70match
eugenefoo.dev
Eugene Foo Yong Chen — Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
70match
jackywijaya.com
Jacky Wijaya — Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
69match
piyushkomali.com
Piyush Komali - Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
68match
anthonyczc.com
Anthony | Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
68match
higgorleimig.com
Higgor Leimig — Principal Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
68match
itani.io
Bilal Itani - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
68match
jacekradko.com
Jacek Radko, Staff Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
68match
jacekradko.dev
Jacek Radko, Staff Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
68match
ponanna.com
Ponanna P M - Backend Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
68match
shehanrathnayake.com
Shehan Rathanayake - Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
68match
supanroy.com
Supan Roy | Programmer & Aspiring Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
67match
andreahayes-dev.com
Andrea Hayes | Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
67match
hendyirawan.com
Hendy Irawan | Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
67match
popkov.com
Albert Popkov CV - Software Engineer and Entrepreneur
1 shared topicscareers
67match
sharifrahat.com
Mohammad Sharif | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicscareers
67match
antfreda.com
Anthony Freda — Staff Software Engineer (Distributed Systems, GraphQL, GenAI)
1 shared topicscareers

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.