similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to kwhitley.com

kwhitley (Kevin R. Whitley) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

davidhenley (David Henley) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aroxby (Andy Roxby) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aaix (aidan) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dombean · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

faqeel (Fares) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Inueni · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

kurumi-tokisaki.com

TyrantRey (TyrantRey) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

trey-k · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

rsavin (Roman Savin) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

bigmusic (BiG) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aPinat (aPinat) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

laralabs.uk 🇬🇧

Laralabs · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1LtFord · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Aericio · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thexman · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

kylemichaelfox.com

kfox112 (Kyle) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

actual.software

nirholas (nich) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.