Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kurtenj.com

Jonathan Kurten | Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
phylomatx.com
PhylomatX | Jonathan Klimesch
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
arielsun.com
Ariel Sun | Design, Innovation, AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
doganural.com
Dogan Ural | Designer & Creator
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
0xrelic.com
Relic | Designer × Builder × AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
cmjdesignstudio.com
CMJ DESIGN STUDIO
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
interiordesignher.com
Interior DesignHer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
0xdesigner.com
0xDesigner
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
rohanskumar.com
Rohan Kumar
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
neuralsystemdesigns.com
Neural System Designs
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
solalnathan.com
Solal Nathan
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
360pixeldesign.com
360 PixelDesign
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
agentcharacterdesign.com
Home | Agent Character Design
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
artbymania.com
Art By Mania - AI Art Designs
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
divyahariharan.com
divyahariharan - UX Designer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ionmesca.com
Ion Mesca — Design Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
solutiondesign.com
Home - Solution Design Group
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
thepromptcase.com
The Prompt Case | Design Your Own Phone Case with AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
arjunpi.com
Arjun Pitchanathan
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.