Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kuriouscreator.com

Kayla Harris · Design Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
matheusagcosta.com
Matheus Costa • Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
matteomule.com
matteomule • product design engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
bockaronson.com
Max Bock-Aronson — Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
theljc.com
LJC Design & Engineering
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
pixeluis.com
Pixeluis — Design & Engineering Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
bhavyasehgal.com
Bhavya Sehgal – Product Designer & Design Engineer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
arkadiuszpalki.com
ARKADIUSZ PALKI — Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
artbyade.com
Aloba Adewale — Multidisciplinary Designer & Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
andrewswank.com
Andrew Swank - Design + Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
ashlynh.com
Ashlyn Harris | Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
assentorp.com
Peter Assentorp - Freelance Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
mbeffects.com
mbeffects | Font Design & Hardware Engineering
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
mateogarreton.com
MATEO GARRETÓN WALLACE [DESIGN ENGINEER]
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
pixelanvil.com
PixelAnvil | High-End Product Engineering & Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
bholmes.net
Bobby Holmes · Designer & Maker
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
bhlabs.net
Bobby Holmes · Designer & Maker
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
bennyschaupp.com
Benny Schaupp · Design + Direction
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
3dmodelingengineering.com
Elokay Inc - Product Design And Engineering Services
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.