Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kunde21.com

Home • Kunde 21 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
redoffice.de 🇩🇪
redoffice – BÜRORING eG
1 shared topicsbusiness
65match
service-experience-lab.de 🇩🇪
Home - ScienceLoft
1 shared topicsbusiness
65match
results-training.de 🇩🇪
HOME |
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
ricokogleck.com
Home - RiKo Solutions GmbH
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
riko-solutions.com
Home - RiKo Solutions GmbH
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
pls-group.de 🇩🇪
PLS Group – Home
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
smarter-outsourcing.com
Home - Smarter Outsourcing
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
quiz-funnel-formel.de 🇩🇪
Home - Lale Müller
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
p4-solutions.de 🇩🇪
Home - Home
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
cms-eshop.com
E-Commerce Kundenportale für Händler und Hersteller
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
cms-plus-shop.com
E-Commerce Kundenportale für Händler und Hersteller
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
inpacs.com
Home - Inpacs
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
onlineshop-stammtisch.de 🇩🇪
E-Commerce Kundenportale für Händler und Hersteller
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
onlineshopstammtisch.de 🇩🇪
E-Commerce Kundenportale für Händler und Hersteller
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
parkarea-solutions.de 🇩🇪
Home - ParkAreaSolutions GmbH
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
saas-pim.de 🇩🇪
E-Commerce Kundenportale für Händler und Hersteller
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
shop-saas.de 🇩🇪
E-Commerce Kundenportale für Händler und Hersteller
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
shop-und-cms.de 🇩🇪
E-Commerce Kundenportale für Händler und Hersteller
1 shared topicsbusiness

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.