Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kumneger.dev

Kumneger Wondimu · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
andreas-herd.com
Andreas Herd
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
angiegonzalez.dev
Hi, I'm Angie - 💜
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewtatham.com
Andrew Tatham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
rodrigocoincurvo.com
Rodrigo Coin Curvo | Software Developer Educator
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
brandonw3612.com
Home - Brandon Wong
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andreinc.net
Home | Personal Site of Andrei N. Ciobanu
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nglikwai.com
LIK WAI NG
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
anguyen2000.dev
Anthony Nguyen
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ahmadshahwan.com
Ahmad SHAHWAN
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alex-abraham.dev
Alex Abraham | Software Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ankitgautam.dev
Your name
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
abenezer.org
Abenezer Belachew / Software Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
arkoisystems.com
$ cat ./arkoisystems
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
nicoc.io
Nico Chaves
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
clojure.dev
Mikko Vataja on Clojure
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
clojureblog.com
Mikko Vataja on Clojure
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
clojuredev.com
Mikko Vataja on Clojure
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
softwaredevelopmenthell.com
Software Development Hell
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.