Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kugantharan.com

504 Publishing | 504 Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
magiquepublishing.com
Magique Publishing – Publishing Magical Fiction
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
gazepublishing.com
Gaze Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
batnamedboo.com
Colonus Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
camelea.com
Camelea Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
distemper-memoir.com
Colonus Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
aplomadopublishing.com
Aplomado Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
eulipionpublishing.com
Eulipion Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
gammongo.com
GammonGo Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
malleuspublishing.com
Malleus Publishing - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
euphoricpublishing.com
Euphoric Publishing | Welcome to Author Sarah E. Greene's publishing company.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
beatipublishing.com
Home - Beati Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
moiraepubs.com
Home - Moirae Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
1kfaces.com
Thousand Faces Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
ishmaelandgray.com
Ishmael & Gray Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
rhodesfiction.com
Rhodes Fiction Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
sherrietodd-beshore.com
Patchwork Publishing, LLC
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
sherrietoddbeshore.com
Patchwork Publishing, LLC
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
dissonancerising.com
HOME | Cratefires Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.