Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ktunc.com

Kevin Tunc · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
alexmaldonado.dev
Alex Maldonado - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
alexlevin.me
Alex Levin
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mayatung.com
Maya Tung
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mcgilldevtech.com
Kevin McGill | McGill DevTech, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
robbietilton.com
Robbie Tilton
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
intellisoftalpin.com
IntelliSoftAlpin
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
rojadesign.com
Rush Ali | rojadesign.com
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
cloupix.com
CLOUPIX | Nearshore Software Development in Tunisia
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
domneill.com
Dom Neill
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
matthewmocniak.com
Matthew Mocniak
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
soniahan.dev
Sonia Han Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
auctionlabs.co.uk 🇬🇧
Elysian Labs – Software Design & Development
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
elysianlabs.co.uk 🇬🇧
Elysian Labs – Software Design & Development
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
arnellebalane.com
Arnelle Balane
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
arnelle.dev
Arnelle Balane
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
adamrichardlimb.com
Adam Richard Limb
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
swsoftwaresolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
SW Software Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
fazalmittu.com
Fazal Mittu
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.