Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ktncodes.com

ktnCodes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
mavencode.io
MavenCode
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
mavencode.com
MavenCode
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
arincode.com
ARINCODE
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
ronfan.com
Ron Fan
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
kuuza.ai
KUuZA
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
agenticdev.net
Home | AgenticDev
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
roguedave.com
RogueDave Codes
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
kutayakpnar.com
Kutay Akpınar - AI-Focused Software Developer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
cloudcodetree.com
AI News · CloudCodeTree
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
acesanderson.dev
Aces Anderson | AI Engineering, LLMs, and Software Architecture.
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
armjen.com
ArmJen | Software Development & AI Solutions
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
fancybread.com
Home - Fancy Bread
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
iovine.dev
CodeSoup | Tech Blog
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
kvkavindu.com
Kavindu Prabath | Software Engineer & Data Scientist
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
faysela.com
Contact Faysel Abdella
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
360degreecode.net
Dominik Fretz | Agentic AI Engineering & Claude Code Expert - Sydney, Australia
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
inventiple.com
AI Product & Startup MVP Development | Inventiple
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
masterclaudecode.com
Agentic Coder
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.