Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ktbierman.com

K.T. Bierman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
ktjayauthor.com
K.T. Jay
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
cmalderman.com
Home | Alderman
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
beyondwunderman.com
Beyond Wunderman
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
ktdady.com
K.T. Dady/Kate Dady – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
theresabiehle.com
Theresa Biehle
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
armandopazos.com
Armando R. Pazos
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
gthogan.com
G.T. Hogan books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
ktcarlisle.com
Murder Mystery Indie Author | K.T. Carlisle
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
armanmirhadi.com
Writer | Arman Mirhadi
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
artburton.com
Author | Art T. Burton
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
ktpike.com
K.T. Pike – Author of the Tales of Airdaeya Chronicles
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
advancedfictionwriting.com
Advanced Fiction Writing, By Randy Ingermanson, The "Snowflake Guy"
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
sokollliterary.com
Daniel Sokoll | Native German Transcreator & Literary Translator
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
sokolltranscreation.com
Daniel Sokoll | Native German Transcreator & Literary Translator
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
dmcrossworks.com
Home - crossworks.pubsitepro.com
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
ktlazarus.com
The Literary Diversions of K.T. Lazarus – A collection of stories
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
armandocreative.com
ArmandoCreative – Go. Be Creative.
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
ktleeauthor.com
K.T. Lee – 📚 Author, engineer, big fan of science and happy endings 📚
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.