Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to krrand.com

K. R. Rand · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
abmoss.net
A. B. Moss – Author
3 shared topicsfiction
64match
dmporters.com
DM Porters – Author
3 shared topicsfiction
63match
rominagarber.com
Home - Romina Garber
3 shared topicsfiction
62match
rklilley.com
R.K. LILLEY
3 shared topicsfiction
62match
maureenamiller.com
Maureen A. Miller | Official Site
3 shared topicsfiction
62match
sofiaduebooks.com
Sofia Due Books
3 shared topicsfiction
62match
alexgabriel.net
Alex Gabriel | Writer. Reader. Romancer.
3 shared topicsfiction
62match
nicolahebronauthor.com
Nicola Hebron Author – Escape Reality, Read a Book
3 shared topicsfiction
62match
arimaanauthor.com
Discover A.R Imaan: A Journey into Dark Fantasy Romance
3 shared topicsfiction
61match
bingeworthyfiction.com
Binge-Worthy Fiction
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
neveronewthbook.com
Never One Without the Other book by Sergio Villanueva
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
rjsamuel.com
RJ Samuel (Rejini Samuel) | Award Award-winning Author | Atlanta
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
arienskye.com
Arien Skye | novel
3 shared topicsfiction
61match
dmrauthorf.com
DMR
3 shared topicsfiction
61match
themafiagal.com
Laureline Ducros | Mafia Romance & Spy Thrillers
3 shared topicsfiction
61match
nicolettepierce.com
- Home
3 shared topicsfiction
61match
rosalie-sutton.com
Courage & Love: Jane Austen Variations | Rosalie Sutton
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
bellthecatbooks.com
Home - Bell the Cat Books | Bell the Cat Books
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.