Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kroneman.io

L Kroneman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
aca30.com
Alhassan's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
guidooffermans.com
Guido Offermans
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
matthewbrowndev.com
Matthew Brown | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
matthewo.dev
Matthew's Website
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
arishwinkishaan.com
Arishwin Kishaan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
rmfaheem.com
rmfaheem's blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andysonm.dev
andysonm
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexandrei.net
alexandrei.net | My website
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
krispaulbabu.com
Kris Paul Babu's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
robbiesessions.com
Home | Rob Sessions | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
rohitnirban.com
Rohit Yadav - Developer & Tech Enthusiast
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
arhealthservices.com
New React Router App
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
datadiver.co.uk 🇬🇧
John James | DataDiver
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
gurdevrattan.com
Gurdev's Personal Website and Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ariii.dev
Anthony Rice III
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
bmaggiano.com
Brandon Maggiano
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
abdu.cloud
abdus website
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
arnewinter.dev
Arne Winter | Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.