Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to krollassoc.com

Kroll Associates - Design Innovation · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
plaidesign.com
Design, Innovation & Strategy
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
pixel-innovations.com
Pixel Innovations - Design Studio Perth
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
calvinmays.com
Design & Innovation
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
hellagoodesign.com
Sprout Studios - Design & Innovation Agency
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
gaurav-asthana.com
Innovation | Gaurav Asthana Design Strategy
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
shaneettestad.com
Shane Ettestad - Product Innovation & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
kohenjudd.com
Kohen Judd: design innovation
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
lx-futures.com
LX Futures - Design for the Future
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
swaimaia.com
Swaim Associates: Innovative Architectural Design Since 1969
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
ankitassociate.com
Ankit Associates - We Design your dreams
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
reyespalomar.com
Reyes Palomar - Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
pjmason.com
PJ Mason - Innovation Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
ivcreativedesign.com
Design | Create | Innovate
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
bauhausinnovationlab.com
Bauhaus Innovation Lab
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
rgsassociates.com
RGS Associates
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
anastasiahanan.com
Anastasia Hanan — UX Research, Design & Innovation Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
bba-a.com
PREMIER Architects & Associates | Commercial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
ixda.com
Interaction Design Association – IxDA
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.