Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to krisshamloo.com

Kris Shamloo · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
maximkim.dev
Maxim Kim | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
krisoncode.com
Kris on code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
3flt.dev
Evan Arnold
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dominicjesse.com
Dominic Jesse — Homepage
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kriskowal.com
Kris Kowal, Open Sourcerer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
gsfontes.com
Gabriel Fontes | About me
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
abhin-sharma.com
Abhin Sharma
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
domslee.com
Dom’s Tech blog | A blog for my programming projects and findings
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
krishgondaliya.com
Krish Gondaliya
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
anydata.co.uk 🇬🇧
Fred Youhanaie | Blog posts and project notes.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anydata.uk 🇬🇧
Fred Youhanaie | Blog posts and project notes.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
akselkristoffersen.dev
Aksel Kristoffersen | Oslo, Norway
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
distrustlp.com
Home – distrustLP
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
newview.dev
index | Paul’s Programming Projects
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
bonnieeisenman.com
Bonnie Eisenman
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
kristiankahkonen.com
Kristian Kähkönen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
rkscodes.com
Ram Krishna 🌟
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
ronniri.com
Ron Niri
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.