Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to krissada.com

Krissada Singhakachain | Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
ansah.dev
Dillon Ansah - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
sheel.dev
Sheel Shah | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
bastamasta.dev
Sameed Ahmed | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
garysib.com
Gary Sibanda | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
nymurreza.com
MD Nymur Reza | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
shravandevraj.com
Shravan Devraj | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
annasicoli.com
Anna Sicoli Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
computemachines.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
garricktse.com
Garrick Tse - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
rheintze.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
estebansolorzano.com
Esteban Solorzano | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
knivier.com
Knivier Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mabdulhussein.com
Moose's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
caden32.com
caden32
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mohanlu.com
Mohan Lu — portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
cadenmilne.com
Caden Milne's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
ivanberlin.com
Ivan Berlin's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
ivanlilla.com
Portfolio - Ivan Lilla
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.