Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kotrous.dev

Josh Kotrous · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
hellotron.com
Hellotron
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
anirudhkotamraju.com
Anirudh Kotamraju
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
5hirish.com
Shirish Kadam
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dirtroad.dev
Sawyer Cutler | Blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
helloraven.io
Raven Richardson | AI Generalist & Decentralized Intelligence Architect
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
evaluating-ai-agents.com
Evaluating AI Agents
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
mohul.dev
Mohul Shukla
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
ethanhouseworth.com
Ethan Houseworth, Projects
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
itaisagi.com
Itai Sagi — Founding CEO, MicroAI Ventures
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
m2iab.com
m2iab Delivery UI
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
moltbookreport.com
Moltbook Report Intelligence - AI Agent Observatory
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
maazattar.com
Maaz Attar
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
shanviinnovations.com
Shanvi Innovations – Build AI Agents
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
caiopizzol.com
Caio Pizzol
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
evalsfutureagi.com
Future AGI | AI Agents hallucinate, fix it faster.
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
heorot.dev
Heorot
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
jagmeet.dev
Jagmeet Chawla
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
divijworks.com
N Divij — AI Engineer & Systems Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.