similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to konert-security.de

Konert Security alternatives & similar sites

Konert Security - konert-security.de — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jw-safety-security.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	JW Safety & Security - JW Safety & Security	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
it-security-tv.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Internet Security TV	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
native-security.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	IT Security	de	information-and-network-security Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
b-sec.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	IT / OT / IoT Security - B-SEC better secure GmbH & Co KG	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
infopointsecurity.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Infopoint Security – News Portal für Cybersecurity und KI	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
infopoint-security.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Infopoint Security – News Portal für Cybersecurity und KI	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
info-point-security.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Infopoint Security – News Portal für Cybersecurity und KI	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
uneedsecurity.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	UNeedSecurity GmbH – IT Security, SOC, Cyberdefense	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
neumann-itsecurity.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Home - Neumann IT-SecurityNeumann IT Security \| Datensicherung ist Chefsache!	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
itsecurityclub.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	IT Security Club - Wibu-Systems	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
it-securityclub.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	IT Security Club - Wibu-Systems	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
insidesecurity.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Inside Security GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inside-security.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Inside Security GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyber-samurai.tech ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Samurai - Ihr verlässlicher IT-Security Dienstleister	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
admeritia.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	OT-Security – admeritia GmbH	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lutrasecurity.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Lutra Security	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
scada-security.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	OT-Security – admeritia GmbH	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
t-alpha.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Security - T-Alpha GmbH	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.