similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to komunitin.com

Komunitin (main repo moved to Community Exchange Network) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

maatko (Matko) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

igodwin (Ivan Godwin) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

izlatin (Ivan Zlatin) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

angelpuertas.com

angel-puertas (Angel) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

itochan (Kazunori Jo) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

itslilscorp.com

itslilscorp · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

daanknoope (Daan Knoope) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

elenaplanka · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

macgreagoir.com

macgreagoir (Mick Gregg) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

pixelipo (Marin Treselj) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thatrex (Rex) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

ricmatsui (Ricardo Matsui) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dintho · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

gemtoo (Gemtoo) · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

rohanfray (Rfr) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

ukaszp (Łukasz) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

krazos · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

pointermaze.com

BendyLand (Ben) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.