Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kmacho.com

Kmacho Technology · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
narustechnology.com
Narus Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
74match
rrsoftware.org.uk 🇬🇧
RR Technologies
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
73match
beyondtechnologyme.com
Beyond Technology ME
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
72match
eucalyptustech.com
Eucalyptus Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
72match
nexgentechnology.co.uk 🇬🇧
Nexgen Technology Ltd
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
72match
24jan.ai
24jan Technologies
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
72match
24jan.com
24jan Technologies
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
simplehinduism.com
MAK Technologies LCC
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
reveilletechnologies.com
Reveille Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
71match
theartofscalability.com
Technology Consulting
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
71match
dpipartners.co.uk 🇬🇧
Technology Consultants
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
martintech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Martin Technologies LTD
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
sintoniastrategy.com
Sintonia Strategy & Technology
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
sjit-services.com
SJ Infrastructure & Technology
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
anilaj.com
Anilaj Technologies - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
aceis.net
Acies | Democratizing Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
bhilwarainfo.com
Bhilwara Infotechnology LTD
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
evanbauer.com
Evan Bauer Information Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.