Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to klausdev.com

Klaus Dev | Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
narayansoni.com
Narayan Soni | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
bilanzkraftpro.com
Wahid Aliyar | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
arjanverma0001.com
Arjan Verma | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
devlevi.com
Levi C. | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
denniskirkebak.com
Dennis Kirkebak | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
im-tom.com
Tom Le | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
abmdev.net
ABMdev | Software Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mandeepsinghdev.com
Mandeep Singh | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
devryanchoi.com
DevRyan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
nadeesha.dev
Nadeesha Hasaranga | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
pchelamelona.com
Beene Chilala | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
simionbruda.com
Simion Bruda | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
akshaykalekar.tech
Akshay Ajay Kalekar | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
angellaqian.com
AQ | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
devhooley.com
Kyle Hooley | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ankurraj.tech
Ankur Raj | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
amirbenshimol.com
Amir Ben Shimol | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.