Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kkieninger.com

Kevin Kieninger · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
ltatakis.com
Home | Lefteris Tatakis
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
lucasgingera.com
Lucas Gingera
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
hmunir.com
Hassan Munir
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alecpagliarussi.me
Alec Pagliarussi
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
owenbick.com
Owen Bick – A software engineer based in Austin and Dallas
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
the-maruf.com
Maruf's
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
atakans.com
Atakan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
atomaoim.com
Atom
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
burckman.com
Juan Fernando Sarmiento Burckhardt (Juan Burckhardt) – Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
byanofsky.com
Brandon Yanofsky – Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
muhammetmacit.com
Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
sikaizhao.com
Sikai's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
albertp.dev
Albert Portnoy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewtc.dev
andrewtc
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
jrtashjian.com
JR Tashjian - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.