Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to kkande.com

kkande 깐데 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
55match
coseul.com
아름다움의 가능성, 코슬
2 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
43match
cellabis.com
셀라비스 - CELLABIS
2 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
43match
elimerek.com
ELIMÈRE
2 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
ivoskincare.com
아이보스킨 공식쇼핑몰
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
holicos.com
HOLICOS
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
arotology.com
아로톨로지 AROTOLOGY | 고기능성 더마 스킨케어
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
bblab-official.com
BB LAB
2 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
guerisonshopping.com
GUERISON COSMETIC
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
aertaer.com
에르테르 AERTAER
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
bakhainc.com
cosble
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
38match
balm-corp.com
에필리프[epilief]
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
cellimed.com
셀리메드
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
cellups.com
셀럽스 (CELLUPS)
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
cepolab.com
화장품 보다 먼저 세포랩
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
cerechipy.com
세레치피(cerechipy) 공식 온라인 스토어
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
cos-up.com
cos-up에 오신걸 환영합니다.
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
38match
dhucosmetic.com
자안
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
medilabderma.com
메디랩 더마
1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.