Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kitirving.com

KIT IRVING - About · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
kimsbookstack.com
Kimsbookstack - About
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
nathandeuel.com
Nathan Deuel - About - in brief
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
patvaldata.com
Pat Valdata - About Pat
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
nandinibajpai.com
NANDINI BAJPAI - About Me
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
rexcanyonbooks.com
Rex Canyon - About the Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
demotivational.com
About
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
naomibergner.com
About
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
renmaguire.com
About
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
nancappo.com
Nan Willard Cappo - about the author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
amyalessio.com
About Me - Amy Alessio
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
nancypanko.com
CHICKEN SOUP FOR THE SOUL - About the Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
kgring.com
K.G. Ring - Author - K.G. Ring, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
malleuspublishing.com
Malleus Publishing - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
penguinbooks.com
Books about Penguins!
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
bethgreenbooks.com
Beth Green | Writing About the Fantasy Worlds of My Dreams
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
archibaldfinch.com
Kids Books About Magic - Coming Of Age Adventure - ARCHIBALD FINCH
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
biggamehuntingbook.com
Big Game Hunting - A Political Thriller by CJ Joneson
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
biglakepublishing.com
Big Lake Publishing - Home
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.