Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kitgrose.com

Kit Grose, UX Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
junhwaoh.com
Junhwa Oh UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
creativemj.com
Murari Jha UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
jundifu.com
Jundi Fu | UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
brunofc.com
Bruno Cano - UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
ejadhav.com
Eknath Jadhav UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
simonmadadi.com
Simon Madadi - UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
atiqahkhalim.com
Atiqah Khalim - UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
mulkimohamed.com
Mulki Mohamed | UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
jwangux.com
Jiayuan Wang – UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
brunazveiter.com
Bruna Zveiter • UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
burhannoman.com
Muhammad Burhan | UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
lramesh.com
Lakshman Ramesh - UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
juliaderevianko.com
Julia Derevianko | UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
andyflaster.com
Andy Flaster - Lead UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
annastrandberg.com
Anna Strandberg – UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
adhemar.net
Charles Guillocher - UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
lorenzostrappelli.com
Lorenzo Strappelli - UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
juliamattos.com
Julia Mattos UI/UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.